Get inbound work done with AI Agents before it reaches your team.

Whatever comes into your Frontier gets reviewed and analysed by custom AI agents, then turned into structured work your team can act on.

Pitch decks, CVs, sales inquiries, lead inquiries, briefs, proposals, applications, documents, requests, or anything else. Whether it comes from outside your company or your team drops it in directly, Frontier applies your workflow and gives your team something ready to review or act on.

Your inquiry is processed through Frontier itself.

Atlas Biotech
Pitch deck · Seed
94/ 100Thesis fit
Reviewed by your agent
Biologics, Phase 2, EU. Core thesis.
Shortlist
01 / Product

An intake page per workflow. One review queue. Clear next steps.

  • Collect files, answers, and context in one place.
  • Every submission analysed, scored, and ranked.
  • Decide together: assign, comment, shortlist, archive.
Your intake page
frontier.cothonis.com / acme / workflow
02 / How it works

From submission to decision in four steps.

A submission arrives through your intake page.

frontier.cothonis.com / acme / workflow

New submission

Every submission is reviewed within 72 hours. Add your files and a short summary.

Submitted by
A. Rivera
Reference
SUB-4812
Summary
Short description, plus attachments
submission-4812.pdf4.2 MB
Submission received · analysing
Submission #4812
01Intake validateddone
02Contents parsed · 6 pagesdone
03Analysing against your criteriadone
04Organising into your queuerunning
05Ready for reviewrunning
03 / Your criteria

You define what good looks like. Frontier applies it consistently.

A new agent takes a minute to set up, and its criteria can change whenever the workflow does. Three ways to create one:

Write the criteria yourself

Set the criteria, weights, and output format directly.

Describe it in plain language

Say what you receive and how you judge it. Frontier drafts the setup for you to review.

Generate it from a document

Upload a brief, rubric, or scorecard you already use, and Frontier builds from it.

Every result can contain a recommendation, a score, supporting evidence, strengths and concerns, missing information, and open questions for your team. Domain-specific analysis can assist the review, but your criteria always lead.

04 / Review together

AI reviews first.
Your team makes the call.

Assign submissions, comment, change status, override recommendations, and keep every decision attached to its source.

Priya N.
Staff Engineer · London
NewLOW
Updated 5m
Maya T. noted5m

Picking this up. Strong systems background, will check the people-management signal.

Julien R. assigned Maya T.18m
Agent · v2.4 updated status42m

Initial pass · 74/100. Flag: light on people-management for a staff role.

Lumen Studio
Creator partnership · beauty
Analysed by AI · In reviewHIGH
Updated 2h
Julien R. noted2h

Audience skews right for the spring campaign. Worth a call?

Sara Klein noted4h

Engagement rate is well above our benchmark for this tier.

Agent · v2.4 updated status6h

Re-scored 84/100 after review. Brand fit: strong.

Northwind Cloud
Managed SOC · vendor
ShortlistedMEDIUM
Updated 12m
Sara Klein noted12m

Adding to the vendor review.

Julien R. updated status4h

Moved to Shortlist.

Agent · v2.4 updated status9h

Scored 88/100. Compliance checklist complete, pricing within band.

Clear ownership and statusHuman review before final decisionsComments and hand-offs in contextA complete decision trail

Ask questions across every past submission.

Search every submission, score, note, and decision in plain language. Every answer links back to the source behind it.

4,812 submissions indexed
Try
You · 09:14
Which candidates best match this role?
CCothonis · Indexed Pipeline

208 applications this month. 31 cleared the screen, 9 currently in interviews.

Applications208
Cleared screen31
In interviews9
Avg. fit82
AskAsk anything about your inbound.
05 / Workflows

Start with a common workflow or build your own.

One review engine. Different criteria, evidence, and next actions per workflow.

Investment teams

Comes in
Pitch decks and investment opportunities
Frontier returns
Thesis fit, deal terms, concerns, and a ranked shortlist
See investment workflow

Lead qualification

Comes in
Inbound leads and demo requests
Frontier returns
Fit to your ideal customer profile, intent, extracted details, and routing
See lead workflow

Hiring teams

Comes in
CVs and job applications
Frontier returns
Role fit, strengths, concerns, and interview questions
See hiring workflow

Partnership teams

Comes in
Creator and influencer pitches
Frontier returns
Audience fit, engagement, brand-safety checks, and a shortlist
See partnerships workflow

Teams hiring contractors

Comes in
Freelancer proposals and project briefs
Frontier returns
Skills fit, scope understanding, rate, availability, and comparison
See freelancer workflow

Procurement and ops

Comes in
Vendor responses and RFP replies
Frontier returns
Pricing, terms, compliance gaps, and ranked fit
See procurement workflow

Onboarding and compliance

Comes in
Required document sets
Frontier returns
What was provided, what is missing, and an analysis of the contents
See document workflow

Legal teams

Comes in
Contracts, NDAs, and legal documents
Frontier returns
Summaries, key terms, flagged clauses, and open questions
See legal workflow

Client services

Comes in
Client briefs and project requests
Frontier returns
Scope, requirements, and a clear next action
See client workflow

Pharmacovigilance

Comes in
Adverse event and safety reports
Frontier returns
Completeness checks, extracted case details, and priority
See safety workflow

Custom workflow

Comes in
Any repeatable inbound submission
Frontier returns
Your rubric, your output format, and your next actions
See custom workflow
06 / What changes

Your team starts with a recommendation, not an unread inbox.

01

Every submission gets reviewed.

02

Every review uses the same criteria.

03

Missing information is surfaced immediately.

04

Every decision and its reasoning stays searchable.

Without Frontier
  • Submissions scattered across inboxes, forms, and attachments
  • Different reviewers applying different standards
  • Repeated manual extraction and duplicated work
  • Meetings beginning with catch-up
With Frontier
  • One intake point for each workflow
  • Comparable analysis against shared criteria
  • Clear ownership and next actions
  • Meetings beginning with a recommendation
07 / Security

Your data stays yours.

Frontier is built for teams handling sensitive submissions.

Plug Frontier into the tools your team already runs on.
Google Drive
Outlook
Notion
Airtable
PitchBookComing soon
CrunchbaseComing soon
Custom APIsComing soon
The controls a security review asks about.
Secure & private
We don't train on your data
Encryption in transit and at rest
Your agents, your configuration
Intake pages are private by default
Multi-tenant isolation
Role-based access control
GDPR compliant
CCPA compliant
Questions

Common questions.

/01

How do people submit?

Through a link you create and share. They do not need a Frontier account.
/02

How long does setup take?

Most workflows can be configured in minutes using a plain-language brief or an existing rubric.
/03

Can I change the criteria?

Yes. Update the criteria, weights, output, and next actions whenever the workflow changes.
/04

Can my team review submissions together?

Yes. Everyone works from the same queue, and every decision keeps its full trail.
/05

What happens to my data?

Your submissions and files stay yours. We do not train models on your data, everything is encrypted in transit and at rest, and intake pages are private by default.
Talk to us

Submit a workflow.

Describe what you receive and how you review it today, and attach an example if you like. Your inquiry lands in our own Frontier queue, our agent reviews it, and Wady comes back with how Frontier would run your workflow.

Submit a workflow

This inquiry is processed through Frontier.

Wady
Wady
Founder & CEO of Cothonis

Prefer to talk first? .