Founders submit through one page. Frontier reads each deck, scores thesis fit, extracts deal terms, and gives your team a ranked queue with the evidence behind every score.
Inbound is scattered: forwarded emails, DMs, attachments buried in threads. Plenty never get read.
Cothonis is a separate surface for it. Create an intake page, share it, and every submission is ranked against your criteria the moment it arrives. Spin up as many as you need: one per thesis, sector, or team. Each runs its own agent, configured in plain language.
A founder drops a deck through your intake page.
Tools like Rogo are built for deep research once a deal is in your pipeline. Frontier operates upstream of that, the layer between submission and shortlist.
The two work together: Frontier surfaces what's worth researching; Rogo takes it from there.
You set the weights, and it scores every deck against your thesis, not a generic template.
Who is building it, and why them.
Size, momentum, and where it is heading.
Revenue, growth, and retention signals.
Whether the model holds up at scale.
Round, valuation, and who is leading.
Submit what you receive and how you review it today. Your enquiry goes through Frontier itself, and you get back a concrete answer, not a slide deck.
Prefer to talk first? .

Decks, applications, proposals, document packs. What arrives, how much, and how you review it today. Attach an example if you like.
Your enquiry lands in our own Frontier queue and is analysed like any other submission. Frontier runs its own intake.
With how Frontier would run your workflow: the intake page, the agent and the queue, on your own examples.